Mom Jeans 2.0
Friday, November 14, 2008 at 12:48AM 
Here's the funny thing about Nü Mom Jeans. They're the exact opposite of what Tru Mom Jeans are all about. The original Mom Jean is incredibly diplomatic; they accommodated all shapes and sizes while maintaining the dual core objectives of bolstering a long crotch and accentuating girth in the rear. Nü Mom Jeans on the other hand, are only successfully worn if you have a very specific, tight little body. Looking at them, they look like something the Rockettes would wear if they were dressed as harried homemakers in one of their dance numbers.
I am totally obsessed with them.
If Mom Jeans Classic could talk they'd say: "I got a 9-inch tall vagina and I'm off the market, boys. My son's name is totally Derrick."
If Mom Jeans II could talk they'd say: "I have the knowledge of a grown woman and no time for pockets. I also have tattoos on my feet."
Reader Comments (5)
Mom Jeans II also say: no actual child has actually emerged from this body. Check it out!
Also: Hey, can you make a U-turn? I think I left my reading glasses back at the Ruby Tuesday. JK! I don't know what any of those words are!
ornate swastika tattoos to boot!
nothing says, "not ready for kids" better than nazi feet.
if she likes children, hope she likes socks even more.
...about the mommy pants:
put scarlett in sweats and she still pulls it off.
put mommy in "mommy pants 2.0," trying to look like scarlett,
you get "mommy pants 1.0" all over.
it's not the design that kills a fad, it's the demand.
I'm a middle-aged male who came of age in the 1980s. I know people love to make fun of fashion trends of that time. To me, the high-waisted, close-fitting jeans with the blouse tucked in is totally attractive to me. I miss the wasp-waisted look on women. I find the low-waisted look unattractive and sometimes downright vulgar. And if a woman can actually fill the seat of her pants with ample curvature in the rear, then that's even better. If some women seem to be stuck in eighties fashions, perhaps it might have to do in part with the possibility that the men in their lives (or the men they wish to attract) who are in the same age range grew to like this look and still do. As long as the woman herself does not object to a particular look, there is no harm in a woman dressing in a way that will guarantee positive attention from her man or from a potential male suitor. Another reason for this style is that the woman herself has become accustomed to it and feels comfortable and confident in it. I think it's ridiculous that so-called fashion gurus insist that people's personal taste in fashion should change every time the fashion trends change. This kind of "fashion pressure" just ends up being a way to keep people, especially women, endlessly spending more money to feed a hungry fashion industry.
What a lovley bum. This woman looks fabulous, high rise jeans were great and i still wear them myself though theyre getting a bit worn. Fashion definetly was a lot better in the 80s or was it my youth?